« Science and Christianity (Part 8) |
| Science and Christianity (Part 9) »
Why Do We Invoke Darwin?
Here is one scientist's view on evolution published at the Discovery Institue.
(Don't shoot me Carol. More to come.)
Posted at 10:16 PM in Evolution | Permalink
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
His point is valid. It doesn't affect the truth or falsehood of the theory, or parts of the theory. It is just not the foundation of all biology.
More significantly, it provides a cultural myth that is helpful in advocating for certain desired ideas -- i.e. progress (at least in individual and group terms, if not on grand terms), the desirablility of diverstity, and a way to feel good about ourselves for being the product of progress, while at the same time letting ourselves off the hook because we're still in process.
Whatever the individual merits of these ideas, evolution serves as a cultural means of transmitting them to future generations. In short, sociologically, evolution is a religion.
will spotts |
Aug 31, 2005 at 11:32 PM
Evolution is not a religion. The theory of relativity is not a religion. Quantum mechanics is not a religion. Genetics is not a religion.
Carol Regehr |
Sep 01, 2005 at 11:03 AM
Interesting to read Dr. Skell's analysis. I can't fault it.
Evolution provides a useful framework for understanding life, but I can see where it is not required for understanding how living systems work.
The "vigorous challenges" Dr. Skell encountered bring to mind the reactions of the NRA to assault weapons control or Planned Parenthood to partial birth abortion. It's not the specific issue, but rather the beginning of a "slippery slope", so a stand must be made.
As one who has had a hand in science for many years, scientists can be as dogmatic as any fundamentalist, and be as resistant to new ideas as the most conservative of people.
Denis Hancock |
Sep 01, 2005 at 11:09 AM
Stay with me you all. I am so tempted to jump ahead to some conclusions that I think you guys might find interesting, but I think it will make more sense if a build this a little more.
Thanks for hangin with me.
Michael Kruse |
Sep 02, 2005 at 05:31 PM
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
(You can use HTML tags like <b> <i> and <ul> to style your text. URLs automatically linked.)
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address
Your email address:Powered by FeedBlitz
John H. Walton: The Lost World of Adam and Eve: Genesis 2-3 and the Human Origins Debate
Elhanan Helpman: Understanding Global Trade
David Whitman: The Optimism Gap: The I'm Ok--They're Not Syndrome and the Myth of American Decline
William J. Baumol: The Cost Disease: Why Computers Get Cheaper and Health Care Doesn't
Brent Waters: Just Capitalism
Tamari: WITH ALL YOUR POSSESSIONS (JEWISH ETHICS & ECONOMIC LIFE)