« YouTube stars mingle and meet | Main | "Why do Christians use statistics badly?" Brad Wright »

Feb 19, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b14d69e200d8351aa60a69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New Climate for Science (Part 3):

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

will spotts

Thank you for this series.

Particularly the flaws in the "consensus" model of "consensus". A very religious argument (appeal to authority) that ignores the fact that for every theory prior to the current theory (on any topic), the consensus position had to have been wrong. Therefore consensus can confer no determinable likelihood of being right this time.

Michael W. Kruse

Thanks Will.

"Therefore consensus can confer no determinable likelihood of being right this time."

We are back to Giddens and uncertainty.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comment Policy

Categories

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Follow Me on Pinterest

Check It Out

Kruse Kronicle on Kindle

Friend of Missional

Clock