« Cultural Matters in Economic Development | Main | A brilliant new approach: Lighting »

Mar 20, 2009


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Does putting an embryo in the wrong womb change what it is? I think someone owes this woman some compensation (maybe a lot of compensation)...but I also think it would be wrong to kill the human being growing inside her.

Michael W. Kruse

I'm inclined to share your position but the fact that such a thing can happen is the tip of the iceberg of bio-ethical questions to come.


Oh yes...we're now in the Brave New World...and unfortunately, the job title of "bio-ethicist" is now held by some of the world's most radical philosophers.



You're right, and many of those who might hold to that long held scientific notion the "precautionary principle" are labelled luddites!

Funnily enough, whilst the 'precautionary principle' is held up as the ultimate guide in environmental science, our fellow scientists in the bio-medicines seems to want to forget the principle even exists.

Michael W. Kruse

Great point about the precautionary principle. I hadn't thought of it quite that light.


To illustrate Phil's point in a pretty direct and ironic way, check this out:


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Kruse Kronicle on Kindle

Check It Out