(I originally posted this in March of 2010. But considering events in D.C. and around the nation, I thought I would reprise it.)
Are we in the middle of a "Fourth Turning," as William Strauss and Neil Howe described? I know some of my readers roll their eyes at this stuff about generations, but a couple of years ago, I did an eleven-part series (Index) on Strauss and Howe's work, focusing primarily on their books Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069 and The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy written in the 1990s. S&H don't believe that history repeats itself, but it rhymes. They see a four-part rhythm to events tied to recurring cycles of archetype
generations. They believe we have entered a fourth turning in the past decade and that the fourth turning will play out through the rest of this decade. Characteristic of the fourth turning is a rancorous civil strife leading to a climactic set of events that sets in motion the consensus for the next several decades.
Two years ago, I wrote a post, "McCain vs Obama. A "Fourth Turning" Phenomenon?" I thought I would reprise a portion of it here:
At the core of S&H's thesis is the idea that there is a repeating cycle of four generational archetypes. Each generation comprises people born within approximately twenty years, give or take a few years. The types are the Hero, the Artist, the Prophet, and the Nomad, which repeat in that order. Every twenty years, one archetype dies off while society is giving birth to the successor version of the dying archetype. This is not to say that everyone in a given generation exhibits the characteristic of the archetype, but in the aggregate, and in terms of the type of leadership that emerges, the archetype gives each generation a distinctive feel.
About every twenty years, there is an alignment where each generation is located overwhelmingly within a particular part of the lifecycle: childhood, young adult, mature adult, and elderhood. This alignment signals a shift in the culture from one turning or "mood" into the next. There are four turnings that follow in succession: 1. High, 2. Awakening, 3. Unraveling, and 4. Crisis. (They can also be likened to spring, summer, fall, and winter.) The high comes after resolving a great crisis and is characterized by a civic spirit and general optimism. The Awakening is a period of spiritual awakening and turning inward to address issues suppressed in the previous Crisis and High periods. The Unraveling is an increasingly inward-focused era where societal institutions fray and fall apart. Escalating rancor and coarseness become part of life. The Crisis usually features escalating societal division that finally gets resolved while addressing some major social crisis like a war or economic collapse. The resolution gives way to a new High, and the cycle starts again. A complete cycle is called a saeculum. S&H would suggest we are in the first 5-10 years of a Fourth Turning, a Crisis era.
The four generations driving events in this Crisis era are categorized as follows:
- Silent Generation (Artist). Born 1925-1942
- Baby Boom Generation (Prophet). Born 1943-1960
- Thirteenth Generation or Gen X (Nomad). Born 1961-1981
- Millennial (Hero). Born 1982-2000?
The Prophet Generation, in this case, Boomers, is the wild card in the Crisis era. Boomers were brought up to question things, were told they could accomplish anything, and were filled with visions of making a new and better world by their parents, who had just endured a tremendous crisis. They had a destiny to fulfill.
In youth, Boomers began challenging tradition with idealistic visions that ranged from the noble to the utterly narcissistic. As they moved into adulthood, they became increasingly inward-focused while still bending the world toward meeting their perceived needs. In the Crisis era, a prophet generation enters a stage of life where they begin to confront their own mortality. The kids are grown, and there is an acute awareness that all those idealistic visions from their youth have not been realized. Suddenly the clock is running out. Urgent action is needed to fulfill the idealism they once felt in their youth.
Yet there is one problem: there are polar versions of what the new vision should look like within the generation. For instance, polls on controversial issues like the Vietnam War show that Boomers register the highest percentage of people who intensely feel the war was wrong. But Boomers also register the highest percentage of people who intensely feel the war was right. This dynamic leads to a combative, winner-takes-all, take no prisoners mindset in the public square.
Meanwhile, the Boomers are sandwiched between two very different generations. The Silent Generation (Artist) grew up in awe of the sacrifices and accomplishments of the G.I generation (Hero) that preceded them. But they often found themselves uneasy with the self-confident, often cold, and mechanistic feel of the G.I. generation. They value the more humanistic and idealistic elements of the Boomers, but they are often disturbed by the Boomer's disregard for what those before them have contributed and are particularly put off by the Boomers' rancorous way of addressing problems. The Silent generation is the generation of consensus, bi-partisanship, and fair process.
Meanwhile, the Gen X generation (Nomads) have grown up in a time of decaying institutions and child neglect. Divorce increased while they were children, and adults went somewhere to "find themselves." As the Fourth Turing unfolds. Gen Xers are evermore focused on what kind of world their children will inherit. They want them to have a better and more wholesome world than they grew up with. Societal institutions are not seen as allies; all of their energy is consumed with trying to make life work at the most elemental levels. They grow increasingly impatient with the grandiose idealism of Boomers and their antics, pushing things ever closer to the brink of chaos.
Finally, the Millennial generation (Hero) emerges on the scene. Boomers see this new generation as the folks who will partner with them in their idealistic visions, whichever variety of visions that may be.
What S&H suggest is that in the Fourth Turning, idealism is needed to surmount the Crisis problems. The Prophet generation often plays an important role in this respect, but they are ever at the brink of spiraling out of control. The Artist generation and the Nomad generation act as a brake on the Prophets' excesses.
So far in American history, the Artists and the Nomads have been successful every time but one. That was in the 1860s. Idealistic Prophet abolitionists and Prophet Southerners succeeded in leading others into their idealistic crusades that resulted in the American Civil War. At the beginning of the war, about 90% of Congress was of the Prophet generation. In 1865 it was still 73%. In the two elections after the war, the Prophet generation dropped to 44%. S&H points out that this is the only time in American history where the stats show an entire generation being voted out of office in such short order.
From Bush being a Nazi who secretly conspired to bring down the World Trade Center to Obama being a socialist who wants to kill babies, does this feel familiar? What do you think?
Comments