« War on poverty? Why presidential campaigns don't talk about the poor. | Main | Maybe Americans Aren't Moving Because They Don't Need To (Rise of the City Economy) »

Nov 06, 2012


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I think that the GOP's rather tight embrace of specific religious doctrines has created a severe deterrent for the non-religious... or even those that are religious along a strain differing from that of what is dominating the GOP platform from the party, especially given the GOP's tendency to tightly control their member vs. the Democrats general inability to corral their members in critical issues. It may be a bit of a stretch, but potentially logical, to say that people, non-religious, 'soft religious', and differently religious, feel like they would chafe under the strict discipline that the GOP exercises over their membership.

Michael W. Kruse

Will Rogers once said, "I don't belong to an organized political party. I'm a Democrat." :-)

I'm not as a convinced as you are that the Democrats are less controlling there members. Pelosi has done a pretty good job. I heard Evan Bayh interviewed recently and he said one of things he found most distasteful as a moderate was the weekly meetings where the Dem caucus rounded up the troops and pounded into them about complete unanimity. I think controlling polarization is the order of the day all the way around.


Well, at the same time, at least voting history has shown, that Democratic members of House and Senate frequently join the GOP when it boils down to what individual members vote on when the law comes to a vote. Even, at times, joining the GOP on filibusters as well. Moreover, both parties have requirement for their members to pay a membership fee, but the Democratic party has a far poorer compliance from their members than the GOP does (referring to: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/01/us/politics/01dues.html?pagewanted=all)

I would contend, alternatively, that the Democratic caucus has started to take more strong-arm tactics because they fail to hold unanimity at critical moments.

Michael W. Kruse

Good points!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Kruse Kronicle on Kindle

Check It Out