Is the Default Position Shifting to Subsidiarity?

Catholic Culture: Is the Default Position Shifting to Subsidiarity?

Not so long ago, most ecclesiastical officials and Catholic academicians emphasized solidarity as a political ideal. Owing to a common misunderstanding of both government and solidarity, that emphasis was almost always at the expense of subsidiarity. In recent years, however, the tide in favor of subsidiarity has begun to turn.

It remains true that concern for the poor and marginalized must be a significant political priority, reflected in how we conceive and use government. But what too many Catholics missed for much of the twentieth century was that solidarity is not really a political virtue at all, whereas subsidiarity is. Solidarity is the concern of all for all. It is the sense of responsibility we are all supposed to have for each other. It leads to that true care and reciprocity which are the marks of a healthy society, and it is prior to politics and government.

But insofar as solidarity has been incorrectly viewed as a political virtue, too many Catholics have insisted on the need to mimic solidarity by using government to enforce what they think the results of solidarity should look like. ... 

... In contrast, the principle of subsidiarity is distinctively a political virtue, though not exclusively so. Based on the truth that human dignity includes the right and the duty of persons to freely participate in the solutions to their own problems, the principle of subsidiarity states that everything should be done at the lowest possible level of organization, and that whenever something more is needed, higher levels of organization are obliged to assist lower levels rather than to supplant them. This means that in the political order the virtue of subsidiarity actually preserves and fosters the conditions within which solidarity can flourish, even if solidarity does not necessarily flourish as a direct result. ...

 

Comments

[ceemac]

Ross Douthat has a column this week that offers a bit of a contrary opinion. Sahring this while duly noting that there is a somewhat different focus in the two pieces. Douthat is talking about current influence of CC on wider culture while this article focuses on internal stuff in the CC.

http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/latest-columns/20130220-ross-douthat-the-end-of-a-catholic-moment.ece

[Michael W. Kruse]

Ceemac, I think this author is talking about trends within Catholic theology. Douthat is talking about about what currency the views are having in the culture. I think both authors could be right.

I saw the Douthat piece. As someone who holds something similar to the views Douthat sees being abandoned, it is personally discouraging. But if there is truth in this model, then I fell the need to talk about it, whether it is in our out of vogue.